STUDIOHOON


Interior
Momento Brewers
Cafe O'Fete
La Joconde
Chloe in Paris
Cafee Blanc
Smida Coffee Roasters
Yeomi: Simple Dining
Sming Studio
Cafe Aesop
Gallery 32
Studio 122-21



Material/Furniture
Concrete: Layer
Light: Subdivide
Chair: Texture & Silhouette
Table: Mixture



Artworks
Choansan Project
세월호: 경계
Superimposition
Palladian Times
***Terminal
Wearable Shelter
Battersea Park Labyrinth



Brand Design
Imperior War Museum: Sensory Museom
A Readingroom: Anti-readingroom
Performance Restaurant: Full Margate
Rooftop: Last Piece
Installation Art: A-frame Garage
GS: GS the Fresh
Febal Casa: Cuccina Naturale
Technogym: Urban Playground
Rizoma: Space Milling



Proposal Works
#044 #045 #045 #052 #061
#062 #073 #074 #075 #077
#081 #083 #084 #087 #088
#090 #092 #100 #103 #104
#105 #111 #112 #114 #122
#125 #128 #131 #132 #135
#137 #144 #145 #146 #149
#151



Overview
T   010-7507-2634 hoon@studiohoon.com instagram



Mark

Space Milling

 




TK / 1962
From The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

            Yet one standard product of the scientific enterprise is missing. Normal science does not aim at novelties of fact or theory and, when successful, finds none. New and unsuspected phenomena are, however, repeatedly uncovered by scientific research, and radical new theories have again and again been invented by scientists.
            The practice of normal science depends on the ability, acquired from exemplars, to group objects and situations into similarity sets which are primitive in the sense that the grouping is done without an answer to the question, “Similar with respect to what?” One central aspect of any revolution is, then, that some of the similarity relations change. Objects that were grouped in the same set before are grouped in different ones afterward and vice versa. Think of the sun, moon, Mars, and earth before and after Copernicus; of free fall, pendular, and planetary motion before and after Galileo; or of salts, alloys, and a sulpuhur-iron filing mix before and after Dalton.





Mark